← Back to contributors
Fatima Jama
Verified ContributorChronicle Law Member

Fatima Jama

Barrister at Mountford Chambers

Criminal LawRegulatory LawAdvocacy
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTOR

Barrister at Mountford Chambers.

Fatima Jama is a criminal and regulatory barrister with a growing practice spanning serious crime, fraud, financial regulation, and professional discipline. She is regularly instructed in complex cases and is experienced in representing clients across the full spectrum of society, from the most vulnerable individuals to senior professionals, company directors, and affluent private clients.

Featured insight from Fatima Jama
CONTRIBUTOR PERSPECTIVECriminal Law & Regulatory Law & Advocacy

Fatima Jama’s profile brings together professional experience, specialist subjects and published Chronicle Law contributions.

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
01

Criminal Law

Follow Fatima for practical commentary and professional insight on criminal law.

02

Regulatory Law

Follow Fatima for practical commentary and professional insight on regulatory law.

03

Advocacy

Follow Fatima for practical commentary and professional insight on advocacy.

LATEST CONTRIBUTIONS

From Fatima’s Chronicle Law profile.

CRIMINAL LAW · 14 MIN READ

Present in Law, Absent in Reality – How Parliament Deemed You Were at a Trial You Never Knew Existed

Section 246 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has quietly changed extradition law, potentially allowing people to be treated as present at foreign trials they never attended. This article examines what changed, the Supreme Court decisions Parliament has effectively overridden, and the consequences for British citizens.

Read the article
COURT SYSTEM · 11 MIN READ

Hello… I’m still on remand….Get me out of here! The High Court Reasserts the Importance of Custody Time Limits

The High Court has quashed a Crown Court decision to extend custody time limits in Bernard v Crown Court at Snaresbrook, reinforcing the constitutional importance of the presumption of innocence and confirming that court backlogs alone cannot justify prolonged pre-trial detention.

Read the article
COURT APPEALS · 10 MIN READ

When Judges Enter the Arena: Judicial Intervention in Criminal Trials

The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mathurin provides an important reminder of the limits of judicial intervention during criminal trials, reinforcing the need for judges to remain impartial and avoid appearing to support the prosecution.

Read the article
PUBLIC CONTRIBUTOR PROFILE

Expertise is public. Membership remains personal.

Contributor profiles display approved professional information and published work. Saved content, CPD records, benefits and account activity remain private within My Chronicle.