← Back to contributors
Rupert Wheeler
Verified ContributorChronicle Law Member

Rupert Wheeler

Barrister at 23 Essex Street

Commercial & Property LawCommercial DisputesChancery Practice
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTOR

Barrister at 23 Essex Street.

Rupert Wheeler is a barrister at 23 Essex Street (23ES) who advises and represents clients in litigation and arbitration, both domestically and internationally. He has a diverse business and property practice with a focus on commercial and insolvency disputes. Rupert also has significant public and constitutional law experience, especially in an international context. He is dual-qualified as a Cayman Islands attorney and was previously a Partner at KSG, a leading Cayman boutique firm.

Featured insight from Rupert Wheeler
CONTRIBUTOR PERSPECTIVECommercial & Property Law & Commercial Disputes & Chancery Practice

Rupert Wheeler’s profile brings together professional experience, specialist subjects and published Chronicle Law contributions.

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
01

Commercial & Property Law

Follow Rupert for practical commentary and professional insight on commercial & property law.

02

Commercial Disputes

Follow Rupert for practical commentary and professional insight on commercial disputes.

03

Chancery Practice

Follow Rupert for practical commentary and professional insight on chancery practice.

LATEST CONTRIBUTIONS

From Rupert’s Chronicle Law profile.

CORPORATE INSOLVENCY · 12 MIN READ

Foreign judgment debts and cross-border insolvency – where do we stand after Drelle?

Can a bankruptcy petition be presented when based on an unrecognised and unregistered foreign judgment? This vexed and important question has attracted substantial interest from insolvency practitioners both on and offshore. The concern is particularly acute for judgments issuing from jurisdictions like Russia, which are unregistrable in England, Cayman and BVI. There is no domestic […]

Read the article →
COMMERCIAL LAW · 5 MIN READ

Privy Council abolishes the Shareholder Rule – Jardine Strategic

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council has abolished the long-standing “Shareholder Rule” in Jardine Strategic Limited v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd [2025] UKPC 34. Despite arising from a Bermudian dispute, the ruling applies in England and Wales, confirming that companies can assert legal professional privilege against their shareholders. The Board held that the rule lacked a sound legal foundation, overturning a century of precedent and marking a major shift in shareholder litigation and company law.

Read the article →
PUBLIC CONTRIBUTOR PROFILE

Expertise is public. Membership remains personal.

Contributor profiles display approved professional information and published work. Saved content, CPD records, benefits and account activity remain private within My Chronicle.