Summary of Article
The article examines the implications of the UK Supreme Court judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16 for schools, particularly in relation to the Equality Act 2010 and how “sex” is interpreted in law.
Key Findings of the Supreme Court
- The Court clarified that “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 means biological sex, not acquired gender, even for people with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC).
- Unless a person has a full GRC, their legal sex is their biological sex. The decision predominantly affects adults, as almost no school-age pupils would have a GRC.
- The judgment does not change the fact that gender reassignment remains a protected characteristic under the Act.
Implications for Schools
Single-Sex Admissions
- A girls’ school does not have to admit trans girls (who are biological boys).
- A boys’ school does not have to admit trans boys (who are biological girls).
- However, these schools cannot exclude pupils of their own biological sex who are trans (e.g., a girls’ school cannot refuse a biological girl who identifies as a trans boy).
Comparators in Discrimination Claims
- When assessing discrimination involving a trans pupil, the comparator must be a pupil of the same biological sex.
Facilities (toilets, changing rooms, showers)
- Regulations in England and Wales require separate facilities for boys and girls aged 8+ (toilets) and single-sex changing facilities for pupils aged 11+.
- Based on the Supreme Court judgment and EHRC interim guidance:
- Trans girls (biological boys) should not use girls’ toilets or changing rooms.
- Trans boys (biological girls) should not use boys’ facilities.
- Schools should provide alternative arrangements where necessary.
Boarding Schools
- Mixed schools with boarding can admit only one biological sex to boarding places, and the judgment confirms “sex” here means biological sex.
Sports
- Under section 195 of the Equality Act, competitive sports can be separated by sex where physical differences create a competitive advantage.
- Schools may therefore:
- Run separate sports for biological boys and biological girls.
- Exclude trans pupils from competing with the opposite biological sex where the activity is “gender-affected”.
Public Sector Equality Duty & Positive Action
- The Court held that treating “women” as a mixed group of biological females and trans women would make data collection incoherent.
- Therefore, PSED and positive action must also treat sex as biological sex.
DFE Guidance
- Existing 2018 guidance on sex separation in mixed schools remains relevant: any sex-based separation must be justified unless a statutory exception applies.
- Draft 2023 DfE guidance on gender-questioning children remains unpublished; its final form will shape future practice but currently offers no legal certainty.
The full, more comprehensive, article by Katherine Anderson of 3PB can be found here: For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers – what are the legal and practical implications for schools?
Katherine Anderson