For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers – what are the legal and practical implications for schools?

For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers – what are the legal and practical implications for schools?

For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers – what are the legal and practical implications for schools?

Summary of Article

The article examines the implications of the UK Supreme Court judgment in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16 for schools, particularly in relation to the Equality Act 2010 and how “sex” is interpreted in law.

Key Findings of the Supreme Court

  • The Court clarified that “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 means biological sex, not acquired gender, even for people with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC).
  • Unless a person has a full GRC, their legal sex is their biological sex. The decision predominantly affects adults, as almost no school-age pupils would have a GRC.
  • The judgment does not change the fact that gender reassignment remains a protected characteristic under the Act.

Implications for Schools

Single-Sex Admissions

  • A girls’ school does not have to admit trans girls (who are biological boys).
  • A boys’ school does not have to admit trans boys (who are biological girls).
  • However, these schools cannot exclude pupils of their own biological sex who are trans (e.g., a girls’ school cannot refuse a biological girl who identifies as a trans boy).

Comparators in Discrimination Claims

  • When assessing discrimination involving a trans pupil, the comparator must be a pupil of the same biological sex.

Facilities (toilets, changing rooms, showers)

  • Regulations in England and Wales require separate facilities for boys and girls aged 8+ (toilets) and single-sex changing facilities for pupils aged 11+.
  • Based on the Supreme Court judgment and EHRC interim guidance:
    • Trans girls (biological boys) should not use girls’ toilets or changing rooms.
    • Trans boys (biological girls) should not use boys’ facilities.
    • Schools should provide alternative arrangements where necessary.

Boarding Schools

  • Mixed schools with boarding can admit only one biological sex to boarding places, and the judgment confirms “sex” here means biological sex.

Sports

  • Under section 195 of the Equality Act, competitive sports can be separated by sex where physical differences create a competitive advantage.
  • Schools may therefore:
    • Run separate sports for biological boys and biological girls.
    • Exclude trans pupils from competing with the opposite biological sex where the activity is “gender-affected”.

Public Sector Equality Duty & Positive Action

  • The Court held that treating “women” as a mixed group of biological females and trans women would make data collection incoherent.
  • Therefore, PSED and positive action must also treat sex as biological sex.

DFE Guidance

  • Existing 2018 guidance on sex separation in mixed schools remains relevant: any sex-based separation must be justified unless a statutory exception applies.
  • Draft 2023 DfE guidance on gender-questioning children remains unpublished; its final form will shape future practice but currently offers no legal certainty.

The full, more comprehensive, article by Katherine Anderson of 3PB can be found here: For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers – what are the legal and practical implications for schools?


About the Contributor
Katherine is an experienced education and employment law specialist who offers first class customer service, legal advice and advocacy. Her practice now encompasses: Employment Education. Katherine has undertaken a number of successful judicial and private mediations as an Accredited Mediation Advocate. Katherine was educated at Cambridge University, United Kingdom, and Harvard University, United States. She...